European Union Competition Law in Sports: Cases and Relevant Aspects of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Their Importance and Influence on Sport Managers and Institutions

Carlos Eugenio Zardini Filho


Recent sport professionalization demanded governmental regulation on the overall sport competition environment. This work intends to clarify and illustrate some important aspects of the European Union Competition Law that are applied to sport organizations and for managers, showing how some important cases have shaped sport practices. Specifically, the current articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) are the focus of this analysis. In brief, the Courts are now supporting their decisions about sport competition issues based not only on the TFEU, but also on the White Paper of Sport and referential cases. Above all, as a consequence of the Meca-Medina case, targeting to evaluate whether a rule adopted by a sport association infringes articles 101 and 102, a methodological approach was defined: Wouters steps (European Commission, 2007). Sports athletes, managers and institutions should assess if their entities are under the umbrella of the European Union Competition Law, taking into account the Wouters steps and the elements of the article 101 (3). Surely, any sport rule in the EU needs to observe the necessity of legitimate objectives and the proportionality of the actions in order to achieve these goals. The case-by-case Court of Justice approach of analysis was chosen as the best option, after all, general exemptions or applications could not take into consideration the specificities of the sport phenomenon. Additionally, sport managers should always foresee the effects of their rules and decisions on the sport industry, in terms of restricting or distorting competition.


Sports Law; EU Competition Law; Sport Management.


Akman, P. (2016). The Tests of Illegality under Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. The Antitrust Bulletin, 61 (1), 84-104.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved from

Budzinski, O. (2012). The institutional framework for doing sports business: principles of EU competition policy in sports markets. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 11 (1/2), 44-72.

Cesar, A. (2017). Método do Estudo de Caso (Case Studies) ou Método do Caso (Teaching Cases)? Uma análise dos dois métodos no Ensino e Pesquisa em Administração [online]. Retrieved from df

Competition and Consumer Protection Commission - CCPC. (2017). Competition Law [online]. Retrieved from

Court of Justice of the European Union (2000). Jyri Lehtonen and Castors Canada Dry Namur-Braine v Fédération Royale Belge des Sociétés de Basket-ball [online]. Retrieved from

Court of Justice of the European Union (2002). Wouters and Others v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten [online]. Retrieved from sf?&num=C-309/99

Court of Justice of the European Union (2005). Laurent Piau v. Commission of the European Communities [online]. Retrieved from =T-193/02

Court of Justice of the European Union (2006a). David Meca-Medina and Igor Majcen v Commission of the European Communities [online]. Retrieved from http://curia.europa. eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=57022&doclang=en

Court of Justice of the European Union (2006b). Federación Española de Empresa de Tecnología Sanitaria v Commission of the European Communities [online]. Retrieved from

European Commission (1999). Limits to application of Treaty competition rules to sport: Commission gives clear signal [online]. Retrieved from

European Commission (2001). Commission Closes Its Investigation into Formula One and other Four-Wheel Motor Sports [online]. Retrieved from

European Commission (2007). Annex I: Sport and EU competition rules (The White Paper on Sport). Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission (2013). EU Competition Law: Rules Applicable to Antitrust Enforcement - General Rules. Luxembourg: European Union.

European Commission (2017a). Press release - State aid: Commission decides Spanish professional football clubs have to pay back incompatible aid [online]. Retrieved from

European Commission (2017b). Press release - State aid: Commission clears support measures for certain football clubs in the Netherlands [online]. Retrieved from

Parrish, R., García, B., Miettinen, S., & Siekmann, R. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty and EU Sports Policy. Brussels: European Parliament.

European Union (1974). Walrave and Koch v Union Cycliste Internationale and Others [online]. Retrieved from content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX% 3A61974CJ0036

European Union (1976). Gaetano Donà v Mario Mantero [online]. Retrieved from

European Union (1994). Gottrub Klim Grovvareforening v Dansk Landbrugs Grovvaresel [online]. Retrieved from A61992CJ0250

European Union (1995). Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football Association v Jean-Marc Bosman [online]. Retrieved from =CELEX%3A61993CJ0415

European Union (1999). Irish Sugar plc v Commission of the European Communities [online]. Retrieved from 61999CO0497

European Union (2000). Christelle Deliege vs Ligue Francophone de Judo et Disciplines Associées [online]. Retrieved from CELEX%3A61996CJ0051

European Union (2008). Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados v. Elliniko Dimosio [online]. Retrieved from A62007CJ0049

European Union (2010). Roundtable On Competition And Sports. Directorate For Financial And Enterprise Affairs - Competition Committee [online]. Retrieved from

Europedia (2017). The Treaty of Lisbon: a Constitution without title [online]. Retrieved from

Fidanoğlu, B. (2011). Sporting Exception In The European Union‘s Sports Policy. Ankara Bar Review, 4 (2), 65-80. Retrieved from Review/tekmakale/2011-2/2.pdf

Geeraert, A. (2017). Limits to the autonomy of sport: EU law. Retrieved from

Goulding, L. (2013). Is the NHS subject to competition law? [online]. Retrieved from

Janssen, C., & Kloosterhuis, E. (2016). The Wouters case law, special for a different reason?. European Competition Law Review, 37 (8), 335-338. Retrieved from

Kienapfel, P., & Stein, A. (2007). The application of articles 81 and 82 EC in the sport sector. Competition Policy Newsletter, 3 (2007), 6–14. Retrieved from competition/publications/cpn/2007_3_6.pdf

Neira, M. & Lippi, B. (2012). Tecendo a colcha de retalhos: a bricolagem como alternativa para a pesquisa educacional. Educação & Realidade, 37(2), 607-625.

Martins, T. (2015). A problemática dos preços predatórios e a probatio diabolica da possibilidade de recuperação de perdas (Mestrado). Universidade Católica Portuguesa.

O'Leary, L. (2012). Regulating the employment relationship in professional team sports. Industrial Law Journal, 41 (2), 1-27.

Practical Law. (2017). Concluded Article 101 and/or Article 102 investigations by the European Commission [online]. Retrieved from

Reinisch, A. (2012). Essentials of EU Law. 2th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Relógio, L. (2013). Licenciamento de Clubes: Efeitos do normativo económico na regulação da competição desportiva (Mestrado). Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa.

Rompuy, B. V. (2015). Editorial: Competition Law in Leisure Markets. The Competition Law Review, 11 (1), 1-6. Retrieved from

Sato, E. & Yeung, L. (2013). Defesa da Concorrência no Brasil e na UE: O Caso do Direito de Transmissão de Campeonatos de Futebol. Economic Analysis Of Law Review, 4 (2), 221-248. Retrieved from

Siekmann, R. (2012). The specificity of sport: sporting exceptions in EU Law.

Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Split, 49 (4), 697-725. Retrieved from

Vermeersch, A. (2007). All's fair in sport and competition? The application of EC competition rules to sport. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 3 (3), 238 – 254.

Wils, W. (2002). The optimal enforcement of EC antitrust law: essays in Law and Economics. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Yin, R. K. (2001). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2th edn. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Texto completo: PDF (English)


  • Não há apontamentos.

Licença Creative Commons
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 .

PODIUM Sport, Leisure and Tourism Review e-ISSN: 2316-932X
Rua Vergueiro, 235/249 - Liberdade, São Paulo - SP, (Brasil). 01504-000